Brian Ingerson
mailto:briani@ActiveState.Com
Clark C. Evans
Oren Ben-Kiki mailto:oren@ben-kiki.org
Copyright © 2001 Brian Ingerson, Clark Evans & Oren Ben-Kiki, All Rights Reserved. This document may be freely copied provided it is not modified.
This specification is a working draft and reflects consensus reached by the members of the yaml-core mailing list. Any questions regarding this draft should be raised on this list. This is a draft and changes are expected, therefore implementers should closely follow this mailing list to stay up-to-date on trends and announcements.
This should not stop an implementer, though! Feedback is welcome.
YAML (pronounced "yaamel") is a straightforward machine parsable data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages such as Perl and Python. YAML is optimized for configuration settings, log files, Internet messaging and filtering. This specification describes the YAML information model and serialization format.
1 Introduction
1.1 Origin and Goals
1.2 Key Concepts
1.3 Example
1.4 Relation to XML
1.5 Terminology
2 Serialization
2.1 Information Model
2.2 Characters
2.2.1 Character Set
2.2.2 Encoding
2.2.3 End-of-Line
Normalization
2.2.4 Indicators
2.2.5 Escape
Sequences
2.2.6 Miscellaneous
Characters
2.3 Strings
2.3.1
Indentation
2.3.2 Line Folding
2.3.3 Quoted
String
2.3.4 Anchor
String
2.3.5 Separator
Line
2.4 Document
2.4.1 Node
2.4.2 Reference
2.4.3 Null
2.4.4 List
2.4.5 Map
2.4.6 Shorthand
2.5 Scalar
2.5.1 Quoted
Scalar
2.5.2 Simple
Scalar
2.5.3 Block
Scalar
3 Changes From Other Versions
3.1 Changes from the 31 Jul 2001
Draft
3.2 Changes from the 22 Jul 2001
Draft
3.3 Changes from the 23 Jun 2001
Draft
3.4 Changes from the 16 Jun 2001
Draft
3.5 Changes from the 09 Jun 2001
Draft
3.6 Changes from the 26 May 2001
Draft
3.7 Probable Future Changes
Yet Another Markup Language, abbreviated YAML, describes a class of data objects called YAML documents and partially describes the behavior of computer programs that process them.
YAML documents encode into a serialized form information having a recursive null, scalar, map, or list structure. YAML also includes a method to encode references. At its core, a YAML document consists of a sequence of characters, some of which are considered part of the document's content, and others that are used to indicate structure within the information stream.
A software module called a YAML parser is used to read YAML documents and provide access to their content and structure. In a similar way, a YAML emitter is used to write YAML documents, serializing their content and structure. A YAML processor is a module that provides for parser or emitter functionality or both. It is assumed that a YAML processor does its work on behalf of another module, called an application. This specification describes the interface and required behavior of an YAML processor in terms of how it must read or write YAML documents and the information it must provide or obtain from the application.
The design goals for YAML are:
YAML documents are very readable by humans.
YAML interacts well with scripting languages.
YAML uses host language's native data structures.
YAML works well with Internet mail architecture.
YAML allows large formatted text.
YAML has a consistent information model.
YAML includes a stream based interface.
YAML is expressive and extensible.
YAML is easy to implement.
YAML was designed with experience gained from the construction and deployment of Data::Denter. YAML has also enjoyed much markup language critique from SML-DEV list participants, including experience with the Minimal XML and Common XML specifications.
This specification, together with the Unicode standard for characters, provides all the information necessary to understand YAML Version 1.0 and construct computer programs to process it.
YAML builds upon the structures and concepts described by XML, SOAP, Perl, HTML, Python, C, RFC0822, RFC2045, RFC2046, SAX.
YAML's type structures are similar to those of Perl. In YAML, there are four fundamental structures: nulls, scalars, maps (%) and lists (@). YAML also supports references to enable the serialization of graphs. This type structure is common to many other languages and provides a solid basis for an information model. Furthermore, it enables the programmer to use their programming language's native data constructs for YAML manipulation, instead of a document object.
YAML has a unique way of handling whitespace. In YAML, a line break is folded into a single space. Excepting indentation, a sequences of spaces and tabs is usually preserved "as is". This technique makes markup code readable while allowing for line-wrapping without affecting the canonical form of the content.
YAML's block scoping is similar to Python's. In YAML, the extent of a node is indicated by its child's nesting level, i.e., what column it is in. Block indenting provides for easy inspection of the document's structure and greatly improves readability.
YAML's quoted strings are similar to C's. In YAML, text scalars can be surrounded by quotes enabling escape sequences such as \n to represent a new line, \t to represent a tab, and \\ to represent the backslash. Unlike C, since line break is folded into a space, a trailing \ is used as a continuation marker, allowing content to be broken into multiple lines without introducing unwanted whitespace. Further, YAML treats an empty line (two consecutive line breaks) as being equivalent to \n. Lastly, 8-bit (ISO 8859-1) characters can be specified using "\x3B" style escapes, 16-bit (Unicode) characters can be specified using "\u003B" style escapes, and 32-bit (ISO/IEC 10646) characters can be specified using "\U0000003B" style escapes.
The syntax of YAML is an extension of RFC0822, allowing for direct usage of YAML in mail handlers.
YAML was designed to allow for both a native in-memory load/save interface and an incremental interface which includes both a pull style input stream and a push style (SAX like) output stream interface. This enables YAML to directly support the processing of large documents, such as a transaction log, or continuous streams, such as a feed from a production machine.
Following is a simple example of an invoice represented as a YAML document. The colon is used to separate name:value pairs. The percent sign following a colon indicates that the value is a mapping. The at sign indicates that the value is an ordered list.
buyer: % address : % city : Royal Oak line one : 458 Wittigen's Way line two : Suite #292 postal : 48046 state : MI family name : Dumars given name : Chris date : 12-JAN-2001 delivery: % method : UZS Express Overnight price : $45.50 comments : Mr. Dumars is frequently gone in the morning so it is best advised to try things in late afternoon. If Joe isn't around, try his house keeper, Nancy Billsmer @ (734) 338-4338. invoice : 00034843 product : @ : % desc : Grade A, Leather Hide Basketball id : BL394D price : $450.00 quantity : 4 : % desc : Super Hoop (tm) id : BL4438H price : $2,392.00 quantity : 1 tax : $0.00 total : $4237.50
There are many differences between YAML and the eXtensible Markup Language ("XML"). XML was designed to be backwards compatible with Standard Generalized Markup Language ("SGML") and thus had many design constraints placed on it that YAML does not share. Also XML, inheriting SGML's legacy, is designed to support structured documents, where YAML is more closely targeted at messaging with direct support for the native data structures of modern programming languages. Further, XML is a pioneer in many domains and YAML has been grown on the lessons learned by the XML community. These points aside, there are many differences.
The YAML and XML information model are starkly different. In XML, the primary construct is an attributed tree, where each element has an ordered, named list of children and an unordered mapping of names to strings. In YAML, the primary hierarchical construct alternates between a list of anonymous entries, a map of named entries, and scalar and null values. This difference is critical since YAML's model is directly supported by native data structures in most modern programming languages, where XML's model requires mapping, conventions, or an alternative programming component, a document object model.
The YAML and XML syntax vary significantly. In XML, tags are used to denote the begin and end of an element. In YAML, scope is determined by line indentation. Where YAML builds upon RFC0822, XML builds upon SGML and has a separate processing instructions and comments syntax. Furthermore, YAML has a simple whitespace policy, where XML's whitespace policy is completely configurable.
The terminology used to describe YAML is defined in the body of this specification. The terms defined in the following list are used in building those definitions and in describing the actions of a YAML processor:
Conformant YAML texts and processors are permitted to but need not behave as described.
Conformant YAML texts and processors are required to behave as described, otherwise they are in error.
A violation of the rules of this specification; results are undefined. Conforming software may detect and report an error and may recover from it.
An error which a conforming YAML processor must detect and report to the application. After encountering a fatal error, the processor may continue processing the data to search for further errors and may report such errors to the application.
A YAML document can reside in many different forms as long as it complies with the information model below. This includes a sequence of bytes in memory, on disk, or arriving via a network socket as much as it includes events from a sequential interface or a language specific in-memory representation. After covering the information model, this section focuses on the serialized representation.
The information model for YAML is a directed graph having map, list, scalar and null nodes. These data structures are directly supported in modern programming languages such as Python, Perl, Java, and C++.
Since the information model is a graph, a separate serialization model is required. The serialization model adds an additional node type, the reference, to record subsequent occurrences of a given node within a sequence. This enables a more compact notation so that duplicate occurrences of a given node need not be serialized more than once.
An ordered sequence of anonymous map nodes. |
|
A YAML node can be one of four types: list, null, scalar, map. |
|
An ordered sequence of zero or more nodes. Nodes are included by reference, thus they may be part of more than one list or map. |
|
A "no value" value. |
|
A sequence of zero or more characters. |
|
An unordered sequence of zero or more (key, node) tuples where each scalar key is unique within the sequence. |
|
The serialization model adds an anchor attribute to every node, and introduces the reference node. The reference node advertises an anchor to indicate the repetition of a node previously encountered. |
|
An additional attribute added to each node that provides for identification of the node within a given node sequence. Only nodes which could be referenced further in the sequence must be given an anchor. It is not necessary that the anchor be unique. |
|
An additional node type consisting of an anchor which is used to indicate the repetition of the node with the same anchor most previously encountered. |
In the serialization model, it is important that each node is serialized exactly once. If a node appears more than once in the graph, only the first occurrence of the node should be serialized. All remaining occurrences of this node should be represented with reference nodes. In this scheme, if a YAML document is loaded into an random access representation, then the reference nodes and anchor indicators should not be available as the non-serialized information model should be used. Also note that anchors can repeat to allow for concatenation, although only the most recent node with a given anchor may be referenced.
Characters are the basis for a serialized version of a YAML document. Below is a general definition of a character followed by several characters which have specific meaning in particular contexts.
Serialized YAML uses a subset of the Unicode character set.
[01] |
char |
#x9 | #xA | [#x20-#xD7FF]
|
Due to the end of line normalization rules, the carriage
return (#xD) is not included. As with standard practice, the the surrogate block,
FFFE
and FFFF
are excluded.
A YAML processor is required to support both UTF-16 and UTF-8 character encodings. If an input stream begins with a byte order mark, then the initial character encoding shall be UTF-16. Otherwise, the initial encoding shall be UTF-8.
[02] |
bom |
#xFEFF |
If the stream begins with #xFFFE
, then the byte order of the input
stream must be swapped when reading. For more information on the byte order mark see
the Unicode FAQ.
On input and before parsing, a compliant YAML parser must translate both the two-character sequence #xD #xA (CR LF) and any #xD (CR) which is not followed by a #xA (LF) into a single #xA (LF) character (this does not apply to escaped characters). This allows for the definition of an end-of-line marker.
[03] |
eol |
#xA |
On output, a YAML emitter is free to serialize end of line markers using what ever convention is most appropriate. For Internet mail, CRLF is the preferred form.
Indicators are special characters which are used to describe the structure of a YAML document.
[16] |
ireserved |
'!' | '`' | '#' | '^'
|
|
[17] |
indicator |
imap |
ilist | isquote | idquote
|
Escape sequences are used to denote significant whitespace, specify characters by a hexadecimal value, and produce the literal quote and escape indicators.
[18] |
eescape |
iescape iescape |
|
[19] |
esquote |
iescape isquote
|
|
[20] |
edquote |
iescape idquote
|
|
[21] |
ebel |
iescape
'a' |
|
[22] |
ebs |
iescape
'b' |
|
[23] |
eesc |
iescape
'e' |
|
[24] |
eff |
iescape
'f' |
|
[25] |
eeol |
iescape
'n' |
|
[26] |
eret |
iescape
'r' |
|
[27] |
etab |
iescape
't' |
|
[28] |
evtab |
iescape
'v' |
|
[29] |
enul |
iescape
'z' |
|
[30] |
ex2 |
iescape 'x' hex hex |
|
[31] |
eu4 |
iescape 'u' hex hex hex
hex |
|
[32] |
eu8 |
iescape 'U'
|
|
[33] |
sescape |
eescape | esquote
|
|
[34] |
descape |
eescape | edquote
|
This section includes several common character range definitions.
[35] |
lwsp |
#x20 | #x9 |
|
[36] |
|
char -
eol |
|
[37] |
pchr |
lchr -
lwsp |
|
[38] |
|
( ( pchr - isquote ) - iescape
) |
|
[39] |
|
( ( pchr - idquote ) - iescape
) |
|
[40] |
|
pchr -
ientry |
|
[41] |
|
pchr -
indicator |
|
[42] |
ascii |
[#x21-#x7f] |
|
[43] |
alpha |
[#x41-#x5a] | [#x61-#x7a] |
|
[44] |
number |
[#x30-#x39] |
|
[45] |
alphanum |
alpha |
number |
|
[46] |
nonalnum |
ascii - alphanum |
|
[47] |
hex |
number | [#x41-#x46] |
[#x61-#x66] |
Moving on to a higher level of abstraction, are sequences of characters, or strings. This section describes line folding and indentation policies, as well as quoted and raw strings.
In a YAML serialization, structure is determined from indentation, where indentation is defined as an end of line marker followed by zero or more spaces or tabs. Indentation level is defined recursively.
[48] |
|
||
[49] |
|
indent(n-1) #x20 #x20
#x20 #x20 |
Since the YAML serialization depends upon indentation level to delineate blocks, additional productions are a function of an integer, based on the indent(n) production above.
The indentation level is used exclusively to delineate blocks. Indentation characters are otherwise ignored. In particular, they are never taken to be a part of the value of serialized text.
To increase readability, YAML serialization allows for breaking long text lines. Therefore in many cases the parser replaces a line break with a single space (#x20). When encountering a sequence of (possibly indented) line breaks without any additional intermediate characters, the parser ignores the first one and preserves the rest. Thus, a single line break would be serialized as two, two line breaks would be serialized as three, etc. When this functionality is implied, the lfeols(n) production below will be used.
[50] |
|
eol (
indent(n)? eol )*
indent(n) |
In quoted strings there is special handling of line breaks immediately preceded by a \ character. In this case the following production is used:
[51] |
elfeols(n) ::= |
iescape?
eol
|
A quoted string is a mechanism to treat a sequence of characters as a single unit. Within a quoted string, indicators (with the exception of \ and ' or ") can be used without worry and escape sequences can be used to introduce unprintable characters and control line folding.
A quoted string begins and ends with a quote character. It can extend for as many lines as necessary, although an editor or emitter is free to re-break and indent a quoted string as needed to maintain readability.
A line break in a multi-line quoted string is subject to line folding, unless prefixed by a \ in which case the line break is completely ignored. This allows a quoted string to be broken into multiple lines at arbitrary positions.
A quoted string cannot contain an un-escaped quote or an invalid escape sequence.
[52] |
sqstr(n) ::= |
|
|
[53] |
dqstr(n) ::= |
|
|
[54] |
qstr(n) ::= |
|
An anchor string is a sequence of numeric digits used when referencing a node previously visited in the document stream.
[55] |
astr |
number+ |
An separator line is used to separate between consecutive top level maps.
[56] |
sep |
eol |
A serialized object is a YAML document if, taken as a whole, it complies with the following production.
[57] |
document |
bom?
eol* pair(0)*
|
A node begins at a particular level of indentation, n-1, and its content is indented at a level n. A node can either be a map, list, scalar, a reference or a null.
[58] |
|
ref
|
An anchor is an indicator which can be used to mark a node giving it an sequential numeric digit for an identifier. The reference node type can then be used to indicate additional inclusions of an anchored node. The anchor string of a reference refers to the most recent node having the equivalent anchor string. Two anchor strings are equivalent if they are identical after removal of any leading 0 characters.
It is an error to have a reference use an anchor string which does not occur previously in the serialization.
[59] |
anchor |
ianchor astr |
|
[60] |
ref |
iref
astr eol |
anchor : &0001 This scalar has an anchor. repeat : &001 An anchor string may be reused. non-ref: Next node refers to the previous one. reference: *01
In some cases a list entry or a map key exists but has no associated value. To indicate this a null node is used.
[61] |
|
inull
eol |
first: ~ second: @ : ~ : Second entry. : ~ : This list has 4 entries, only two with values. three: This map has three keys, only two with values.
A list is the simplest form of node, it is a sequence of nodes at a higher indentation.
[62] |
list(n) ::= |
ilist
eol
|
list: @ : First item in top list : @ : Subordinate list : @ : Above list is empty : A multi-line bulleted list entry : Sixth item in top list
A map is an association of unique keys with values. Where a key is either a quoted or a single line simple string.
[63] |
map(n) ::= |
|
|
[64] |
pair(n) ::= |
|
|
[65] |
key(n) ::= |
|
In a given map, there is the further restriction that within the map, two folded key values cannot be identical.
map: % first : First entry second: % key: Subordinate map! third item: @ : Subordinate list : % : Previous map is empty. ":": This key had to be quoted. "This is a multi-line key" : Whose value is in the next line.
YAML provides a shorthand form for serializing a severely restricted set of map keys. This is merely an alternative syntax for writing the same keys the usual way.
The shorthand form is intentionally restricted. The key must be a single non-alphanumeric ASCII character and the value must be an indicator-free and space-free string.
The shorthand form is meant to be used for special purposes rather than for normal application keys. Currently, three special keys have standard semantics assigned to them:
Specifies a class name. If the YAML parser recognizes the this name, the parser de-serializes the map into an object of that class instead into a regular map.
Specifies a serialization format. A serialization format optionally accompanies a class name and sepecifies the exact syntax used to de-serialize the object.
Specifies a default value for the map. This allows a certain type of schema evolution. What used to be a list or a simple scalar value may be converted into a map (or an object), given additional properties, and still be acceptable to an older application expecting a the original value type, provided it is using an API aware of the default value convention.
Additional standard keys may be defined in future versions of this spec, and a set of keys may be reserved for application-specific use.
The shorthand keys may be associated with a scalar or list node as well as with a map node. When it is associated with such a node, the effect is to convert it into an map node as far as the information model is concerned. The map will include the specified shorthand keys and the original node value (scalar or list) is placed under the = default value key.
[66] |
|
isopen sentry ( lwsp
sentry )* isclose |
|
[67] |
|
skey svalue |
|
[68] |
|
nonalnum |
|
[69] |
|
ichr* |
line: [!line] % from: [!point] % x: 12.5 y: 3.5 to: !: point x: 12.5 y: 3.5 ordered: 10-JAN-2001 sent: [!date %m/d/y] 1/12/2001 delivered: % !: date %: d/m/y =: 14/1/2001 triangle: [!poly] @ : [!point] % x: 12.5 y: 3.5 : [!point] % x: 3.5 y: 12.5 : [!point] % x: 1.5 y: 2.3
While most of the document productions are fairly strict, the scalar production is generous. It offers three styles of expressing scalar values depending upon the readability requirements. Some of these styles may be used for specifying map keys. The table below describes the various styles.
Line Folded? | Used in keys? | Escaped? | |
Quoted Scalar |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Simple Scalar |
Yes |
Yes (single line only) |
No |
Block Scalar |
No |
No |
No |
[70] |
|
quoted(n) | simple(n) |
block(n) |
A quoted scalar uses quoted strings. This is the most general scalar form, allowing every possible Unicode string to be expressed at the cost of some verbosity.
Quoted strings may be used for keys as well as for scalar values.
[71] |
|
qstr(n)
eol |
first: "Quoted scalar.\nWith a new line." second: @ : "Line breaks are folded so this -> <- new line is the same a space. A new line may be inserted by using a blank line: Or an escape: \n. A line may be brok\ en anywhere by escaping the newline." : 'Each type of quotes may be used to avoid the need for quoting the other: "' : "Furthermore indicators such as @ # : can be added." : 'Escape sequences can be used to specify quotes and unprintable characters: \', \a, \x01.' : " Leading and trailing spaces are significant in all lines " : 'This was a list of six quoted scalars!'
Simple scalars are more limited then quoted scalars. Line folding is always performed as there is no way to escape a newline. There is no way to specify non-printable characters, and the content must not start with an indicator. Leading white space can not be specified on the same line as the map key or the list entry indicator. Any such white space must be specified in the following line.
In exchange for these limitations, a simple scalar is more readable then a quoted string, since no escaping is required for ', " and \ characters and no surrounding quotes are used. To delineate the end of this scalar, indentation is employed.
If the value of a simple scalar begins or ends with a single LF character, this character is ignored rather than adding a leading or trailing space character to the value. This allows a scalar value to be naturally specified starting at a separate line, and also allows an elegant way of specifying the empty string value.
A limited form of simple scalars may be used as keys. Simple scalar keys are limited to a single line and may not contain any leading or trailing white space.
[72] |
simple(n) ::= |
( ichr
lchr* )?
|
|
[73] |
|
kchr+ (
lwsp+ kchr+ )* |
empry: first: The value of the previous key is the empty string. second: This value has just one leading white space, and is terminated by a hard newline (LF). third: <html><head><title>Embedded HTML!</title></head> <body><p class="none">This can even have embedded HTML since there is no escaping, and since < (the starting character) is not an indicator! </p></body> fourth: Indicators like @ : % are allowed, as well as quotes, as long as the first character is not an indicator. Further, whitespace is preserved. fifth: @ : A single line entry. : A second, multi-line, entry of the list. : A third, multi-line list entry, without any leading or trailing white space. : : The value of the previous entry is two hard newlines (LF LF).
A block scalar is even more restricted then a simple scalar. A block scalar value must begin in a line following the block indicator. Like simple scalars it is restricted to printable characters only. Unlike a simple scalar, no line folding is done, and therefore long lines cannot be broken. In fact, no processing is performed on block characters aside from stripping away indentation and end of line normalization.
In exchange, block scalars are the most readable format for source code or other text values with significant use of indicators, quoted escaping, or significant newlines. They may also start with any printable character, indicators included.
The value of a block scalar contains, by default, a trailing LF. To prevent this trailing newline from being added, the block indicator should be immediately followed by a '-' character.
[74] |
block(n) ::= |
|
first: | This is a block scalar, with significant whitespace, and the use of " @, etc. All whitespace is significant. second: |- No leading nor trailing new line. second: @ : | First list item which has a leading and trailing new line. : |- Second list item. Does not have leading nor trailing new line. Has two new lines altogether.
Moved eol productions to the end, rather then the start, of most productions. The wording and productions for the simple scalar were fixed to match each other and the indended semantics. The simple scalar example set was enhanced to clarify the proper interpretation.
Both empty top level maps and no top level maps are now allowed, and hence so are empty documents.
Thanks to Joe Lapp for reviewing the 22 Jul 2001 draft and recommending these changes.
Fixed phrasing in the abstract, and sections 1.4, 2.1, 2.3.1, 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.5, 2.4.6 and 2.5.3.
Fixed productions: added production 47, 59, fixed productions 57, 58, 60 and 64 (productions numbers in the 22 Jul 2001 draft are off by one in some cases). Most are bug fixes. Actual changes include allowing for empty lines surrounding a top level map, allowing an optional trailing seperator line, and forbidding annotations which have no sensible semantics (anchor to null, anchor to a reference, shorthand for a reference).
Due to the decision to leave all API related issues outside the core spec, the spec has been re-merged into a single file, covering just what used to be the introduction and serialization sections of the previous specs.
The spec now refers only to the Unicode standard. Due to the efforts by the Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646 groups, both standards are in almost complete agreement. The additional features provided by the ISO/IEC standard are rarely used in practice, while Unicode is simpler and is more widely supported by existing languages and systems.
Indentation is now a strict 4 spaces per level. This allows for the new whitespace policy and the new block notation.
The spec introduces a shorthand notation for attaching special keys to any node type (converting it to a map if necessary). This will need more work.
Null nodes have finally been added, after somehow eluding all previous versions.
Change the * optional prefix for scalar list entries to a mandatory : and therefore remove the special name "bulleted list entries".
Multi-line simple keys are now out. The door is open for re-introducing them, however.
White space folding has been replaced by line break folding. White space is now always significant, except for indentation and for seperation of structure tokens.
The syntax for block scalars has been replaced by a more elegant one.
The spec is now separated into several files. This allows different versions of the spec to share the same version of unchanged section, and make it easier to refer to a particular version of important pieces of the spec such as serialization and interfaces. All the HTML files use the same shared CSS file. Cross references between the separate parts of the spec are now relative, though references to older versions are absolute and refer to the main site.
Change the wording on the information model to allow for graphs with cycles. The alternative is to define the anchor semantics in such a way that would preclude cycles.
The escape sequence \z was added to allow convenient escaping of the ASCII zero (null) character.
The information model now contains just one type of scalar. The special syntax for binary scalars has been removed. This functionality will be re-added in the form of a color.
The syntax no longer supports the !class syntax. This functionality will be re-added in the form of a color.
Change the optional prefix for scalar list entries to * and rename such entries to "bulleted list entries".
Allow for multi-line simple keys and unify the description of scalar keys and values where it makes sense.
All the HTML pages have gone through Tidy. Also, all the HTML files have been run through an HTML validation service and a CSS validation service. Broken links and spelling were checked using another online HTML validator. This needs to be repeated for all future drafts.
Beyond using base64 for binary scalars, no additional special relationship with MIME is expected. Hence references to the MIME and mail RFCs were moved from section 1.1 ("required reading") to section 1.2 ("background material").
Indentation is now completely strict for all scalar styles. Also, the productions were changes to use a consistent semantics to the indentation level parameter.
A list scalar entry may be prefixed by an optional : indicator to improve readability of multi-line simple scalar values.
Leading zeros are now ignored for comparing anchor strings.
The document production was fixed so as not to require an empty line at the start of a document.
The set of character escapes is now maximal (including the rare \e escape for the useful ASCII ESC character). Also, it is now possible to "escape" a line break in a quoted string (the previous drafts were inconsistent at this point).
The current draft allows such characters, and includes a specialized escaping format ('\Uxxxxxxxx') to support them.
The changes section was added for easier comparison of different versions. The final draft will not contain this section.
The indicator was changed from # to ! to allow for # to be used for comments.
The document production was fixed so as not to require an empty line at the end of a document.
Indentation in quoted strings and binary blocks is now strict to ensure readability.
Problems in the productions were fixed, especially where related to white space issues and formatting of the result.
The link to the Unicode FAQ was moved to section 2.2.2.
The information model now distinguishes between text and binary scalars.
It may be useful to base the definition of a valid character on Unicode character properties. For example, we may define a valid character as any printable Unicode character.
As this is the first draft to contain this features, changes are to be expected. In particular, the exact set of valid keys needs to be defined and partitioned to "standard YAML keys" and "application defined keys". Similarly, the set of possible values for each key must be defined. Currently, for example, it excludes the possibility of using Java style '.'-separated class names as a value.
On the one hand, this may be useful. On the other, in some cases (reference to a map), it is no longer possible to map a YAML reference to a native language pointer or reference. The current draft simply forbids attaching shorthand to a reference, but the decision is not final (yet).
The policy with regard to seperator lines and empty lines following them needs to be finalized.
Ensure there are enough examples. In particular, special syntax forms should be demonstrated to remove doubt in the interpretation of the productions.
Verify all productions are correct, are actually used, and properly hyper-linked. Joe has done a good job reviewing the previous draft, so this draft is much improved. Still, a re-verification will need to be done for a release candidate.
Spell and grammar checking, formatting, etc. Again, this draft is much improved thanks to Joe's review, but this will need to be repeated for a release candidate.